<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climbing: My Favorite Rappel Knot &#8212; Figure 9 (video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine</link>
	<description>Inch by inch, I will get there.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mudworm</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12098</link>
		<dc:creator>mudworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12098</guid>
		<description>More of a teaching assistant. Others do the teaching, and I do the demonstrations.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a teaching assistant. Others do the teaching, and I do the demonstrations.  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudworm</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12097</link>
		<dc:creator>mudworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12097</guid>
		<description>I just upgraded the plugin.  :-)  Oh, I see what you are saying. Yes, many people do that and prefer it over double fisherman&#039;s finish. I sometimes do it too depending on the mood (and how much tail I happen to have to work with). Thanks for clarifying for me that it was not &quot;knot on a bite&quot; but rather &quot;bight&quot; and a bight was not what I thought it was. I didn&#039;t want to say that on the mailing list, but I got misled on the terminology and spelling by someone sitting near me last night.  ;-)  Anyhow, it was a good discussion. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded the plugin.  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Oh, I see what you are saying. Yes, many people do that and prefer it over double fisherman&#8217;s finish. I sometimes do it too depending on the mood (and how much tail I happen to have to work with). Thanks for clarifying for me that it was not &#8220;knot on a bite&#8221; but rather &#8220;bight&#8221; and a bight was not what I thought it was. I didn&#8217;t want to say that on the mailing list, but I got misled on the terminology and spelling by someone sitting near me last night.  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Anyhow, it was a good discussion. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12096</guid>
		<description>Did you just add that plugin?

The tie in I use is essentially a figure-8, but instead of tying a double-fisherman&#039;s with the end of the rope, I take the end around the standing part and then tuck the end back into the figure-8...

Someone told me that&#039;s called a figure-9, but it&#039;s looking like that information was incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you just add that plugin?</p>
<p>The tie in I use is essentially a figure-8, but instead of tying a double-fisherman&#8217;s with the end of the rope, I take the end around the standing part and then tuck the end back into the figure-8&#8230;</p>
<p>Someone told me that&#8217;s called a figure-9, but it&#8217;s looking like that information was incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudworm</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12092</link>
		<dc:creator>mudworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12092</guid>
		<description>I have to reply to this one just to make sure the new threaded-comment plugin works well. It seems to be because it allows me to get to the 3rd level. Cool, we can just keep going...  :mrgreen: 

Okay, back to the knot. Now that I think about it, it is not impossible to tie a figure 9 as a tie in knot and then do the follow through just like what you do with figure 8. I do not personally know anyone who does it. One argument against it that I can think of is: with figure 8, it&#039;s very easy to visually check the integrity and correctness (10-point check?), but with figure 9, Hmmm... most people probably will pull their hair out trying to figure out if you did it right or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to reply to this one just to make sure the new threaded-comment plugin works well. It seems to be because it allows me to get to the 3rd level. Cool, we can just keep going&#8230;  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Okay, back to the knot. Now that I think about it, it is not impossible to tie a figure 9 as a tie in knot and then do the follow through just like what you do with figure 8. I do not personally know anyone who does it. One argument against it that I can think of is: with figure 8, it&#8217;s very easy to visually check the integrity and correctness (10-point check?), but with figure 9, Hmmm&#8230; most people probably will pull their hair out trying to figure out if you did it right or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12091</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12091</guid>
		<description>ah...the student, has become....the teacher! 

nice job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah&#8230;the student, has become&#8230;.the teacher! </p>
<p>nice job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12080</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12080</guid>
		<description>No, not sure about the name of the tie-in knot... Just what someone told me somewhere along the way...  Based on the RR discussion, I&#039;d say it&#039;s likely that my source was wrong and that this is the actual Figure-9  :biggrin: .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not sure about the name of the tie-in knot&#8230; Just what someone told me somewhere along the way&#8230;  Based on the RR discussion, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s likely that my source was wrong and that this is the actual Figure-9  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':biggrin:' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudworm</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12079</link>
		<dc:creator>mudworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12079</guid>
		<description>You are welcome. But are you sure the tie-in know is a figure 9???  I&#039;ve never heard such thing! In my understanding, Figure 9 is not about the &quot;finish&quot;, it&#039;s about 8+1=9.  :biggrin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome. But are you sure the tie-in know is a figure 9???  I&#8217;ve never heard such thing! In my understanding, Figure 9 is not about the &#8220;finish&#8221;, it&#8217;s about 8+1=9.  <img src='http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':biggrin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/2009/02/figure-nine/comment-page-1#comment-12078</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mxi2000.net/mudworm/?p=222#comment-12078</guid>
		<description>Nice.  Thanks for making this.  I was following the discussion on Rock Rendezvous, but wasn&#039;t familiar with this knot.  I&#039;d heard that the tie-in knot that I use is called a Figure-9, or a &quot;Yosemite finish&quot; to a Figure-8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  Thanks for making this.  I was following the discussion on Rock Rendezvous, but wasn&#8217;t familiar with this knot.  I&#8217;d heard that the tie-in knot that I use is called a Figure-9, or a &#8220;Yosemite finish&#8221; to a Figure-8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
